Generally I don’t like using the flag of the European Union as a kind of protest symbol. Just as I don’t like the ‘Ode to Joy’, the phrase ‘European integration’ or the hashtag #euromaidan, despite the fact that I’ve already used it myself several hundred times. I don’t like them because they do not evoke any emotions, just as the official symbols of the IMF, UN, OSCE or the EBRD don’t. I don’t like them because, in contrast to the national flags and hand-painted posters, they were invented or chosen in offices. So that’s why I can’t force myself to use the symbol of the European currency as my profile picture. What does money have to do with anything here?
At the same time, I realise that talking about these symbols without context is pedantry. For us on the #euromaidan, the word ‘euro’ doesn’t mean the European Commission, or the cabinet meeting in Brussels, or the currency, or Baroness Ashton, or the bureaucrats. These days I do not have enough time to respond to the questions from Western journalists who, as they did in 2004, are asking about Ukraine’s choice between Russia and the EU.
In fact, if you don’t explain what is inherent in the concept of ‘euro’ from abroad, the protests about European integration might look strange. Nor did we understand why the Turks got so angry about the construction of a tiny park, or why millions of Brazilians are ready to crawl under batons and bayonets because of a rise in the prices of bus tickets.
It is popular to assume that it is not the European Union which the Ukrainian people support, but rather European values (including material values). However, I don’t believe that anything like specifically ‘European values’ exist, just as there is no such thing as ‘European’ human rights. They are just human rights, which should be universal from Tokyo to Rio, New York to New Delhi. And if you look not at the letter of #euromaidan but rather at its spirit, the euro itself is secondary. And that’s why it is so hard to find appropriate opponents to the protests. After all, it’s not a question of making a ‘geopolitical choice’ in a strictly literal sense, not supporting the EU or anti-Russian sentiments, but rather the right of citizens to take to the streets when their opinions are brazenly disregarded, even though supposedly “the people are the source of power”. They have to do the same as the citizens of Turkey, Brazil, Egypt and the USA did, speaking of values which are common to all people.
In fact, it means that abandoning the ‘Euro-choice’ in Ukraine means remaining in the territory of lawlessness and tyranny, ignorance and kleptocracy. Abandoning the ‘Euro-choice’ in Ukraine means being stuck in a grey zone where education and professionalism are empty words; where being different risks earning you a kick in the head. Abandoning it right now means doing it at a time when we find ourselves on the brink, and we risk falling into an abyss where every day would be like this: Vradiivka and Indylo – a village in the south of Ukraine where local policemen raped and beat up a girl, and a 20-year old student who died after being tortured at a police station. Where ‘education’ means Tabachnyk and Farion – a Minister of Education who denies that western Ukrainians are really Ukrainian and is trying to ‘Sovietise’ Ukrainian historiography; and a neo-Nazi MP, former communist party member and school teacher who claims those who does not speak Ukrainian ought to be jailed. Where ‘healthcare’ means Sliusarchuk and a drug called ‘Ukrain’ – a distinguished neurosurgeon who turned out to be a fake, and in the end was accused of forgery, fraud and illegal medical practice which led to the deaths and injuries of patients; and a fake anti-cancer drug sold by a political party which lead to the death of the patients. Where ‘art’ means Zabolotnaya’s black square – a mural critical of the church, which was painted black by the curator of a modern art exhibition in an act of censorship.
That’s why this time, the presence of journalists on the streets does not raise any questions, because the EU flag no longer represents a choice between the EU and Russia, where there is a compelling argument ‘for’ or ‘against’; but instead, it is a revolt against everything which journalism should be exposing, but has become a routine. That’s why the old slogan ‘death to our enemies’ grates on the #euromaidan, like the presence of those pseudo-politicians who have not yet realised that the protests of ‘the opposition against the government’ were left behind last century. That is why I don’t care what they say, because victory for the #euromaidan does not mean taking political power, but rather changing the rules. So that’s why they cannot substitute the popular chant of ‘Shame!’ with ‘Schen-gen!” – even though at our western border, a wall is still standing that has become the Wailing Wall for non-Schengen Ukrainians. It really is something mentally more terrible.
That is why the speech by one of Ukraine’s best historians, Yaroslav Hrytsak, resonated so strongly with me; it evoked the feeling that I was an equal part of the world, and not just a person who “places all their hope on becoming part of the creation of a political economy” (which I actually respect a lot as the post-war settlement in Europe). And although a “revolution of equals in independence” sounds way too poetic, Hrytsak speaks of a revolution that has other civic aims, and “does not resemble the Orange Revolution or the Rose Revolution in Georgia, but rather Occupy Wall Street, Bolotnaya Square in Moscow, or what was done in Istanbul. This is a revolution of young educated people, who are educated but have no future. This is a rebellion by people who were supposed to live like the middle class… and whose only way out is to treat the old politicians and the old politics with scepticism.”
In my reports about arbitrariness, bribery and corruption in other similar territories, I sometimes wrote “The name of this country could be replaced by others”. Hrytsak’s words spoke to me because for the first time, I could even replace the name of the country in this post about the Arab generation of revolutionary change: “A generation which calls everything into question: faith, power, system, media, authority, tradition, nation, borders, all the existing ideologies, the rules of the game, even the need to play games. A generation for which East and West are not constants, fixed points which force you to choose whose side you are on. A generation for which there is no black or white, because first of all you have to understand and ask questions at any moment, and immediately question any answer you receive.”
Of course there will always be someone who says that mass demonstrations have no impact, against the background of those mass protests that have swept the world but were not always effective; but it seemed that the demonstrations alone – which in Ukraine had systematically been discredited by all parties bribing the participants – have come back to life. And during the year I spent in the Arab world, Turkey, Greece, Brazil and the US, talking with community activists, politicians, theorists and sociologists who study protest movements, I came to the conclusion that Ukrainians don’t have many reasons to be disappointed with the initial failure of the civil demonstrations, which should not be confused with the systemic defence of the people’s own rights. The principles of success are simple: organisation, resourcefulness, perseverance and time.
I came to the #euromaidan from Beirut, from where I returned in a very tranquil state, because there is no reason for despair and despondency. Simply, there are more reasons to work harder now. In Beirut, I spoke with young Syrians: DJs, broadcasters, musicians, with whom we share common, human values. They left Syria not because the country is a wreck (which it is), but because they do not have the option of not fighting and not killing (because of the military conscription). For more than two years they have experienced horrors which are impossible to imagine. You might say there is no point in making comparisons with those who turned out to be in an even worse state. But that’s not the point. Quite simply, a lot of them have found a way to hold on, not to be depressed, not to say ‘all is lost’, they are and they will be. They know that ‘whether you want it or not, you can’t suddenly get rid of universal injustice’, but they have found a simple way: everyone has to do their job, which even though it may not amount to much, changes things around them. Without despair and without despondency.
Last Thursday, a day when after all the commitments and five years of negotiations, the government announced it was breaking off the EU Agreement talks, we were a bit nervous, as we planned to launch our online public broadcasting TV channel www.hromadske.tv for the first time; it was supposed to have gone on air a week later, but it took off the next day. Not to support ‘Euro-integration’, but to support civil integration. A week ago, the most popular Facebook statuses were ‘let’s immigrate’, as well as complaints about the pervasive cynicism. Today, some friends are arranging ‘CinemaMaidans’ on the city squares, and gathering signatures for a ‘personal association’; instead of talking loudly about the crisis of the EU, they are charting an alternative course; and instead of getting angry on Facebook that right-wingers want to steal their protest, they are organising a students’ strike and a ‘Voices of Maidan’ campaign, just as students in Lviv turned off the microphone in front of an ultra-nationalist MP. And this has nothing to do with Euro-integration.
I still dislike the official flag of the EU, as opposed to, say , the overused Guy Fawkes mask; it seems that the Ukrainians are bringing some humanity to #euro part of maidan.